When a prospect's security questionnaire asks for "SOC 2 or ISO 27001", founders often assume they are interchangeable. They overlap a lot, but they come from different traditions, produce different outputs and suit different buyers. Picking the wrong one first can cost months. This guide compares them so you can match the choice to your sales pipeline.
What each one is
ISO/IEC 27001 is an international standard for an information security management system. An accredited certification body audits you and, if you pass, issues a certificate that is valid for three years with annual surveillance audits. The certificate states your scope. It is widely recognised in Australia, Europe, the UK and Asia.
SOC 2 is an attestation framework from the American Institute of CPAs. A licensed CPA firm examines your controls against the Trust Services Criteria: security, which is mandatory, plus optional availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy. The output is a report, not a certificate, usually shared with customers under NDA.
Type 1 and Type 2
A SOC 2 Type 1 report covers the design of controls at a point in time. A Type 2 report covers whether controls operated effectively over a period, commonly three to twelve months. Most enterprise buyers want Type 2. A Type 1 can help as an interim step but rarely closes the question for long.
Side-by-side differences
- Output: ISO gives a public certificate; SOC 2 gives a detailed private report with the auditor's testing and any exceptions.
- Who audits: ISO uses accredited certification bodies; SOC 2 uses licensed CPA firms.
- Focus: ISO tests that a management system identifies risk and improves over time; SOC 2 tests specific controls against criteria.
- Geography: SOC 2 dominates in North American SaaS procurement; ISO 27001 is generally preferred elsewhere, including Australian government and enterprise buyers.
- Renewal: ISO runs on a three-year cycle with surveillance audits; SOC 2 Type 2 reports are typically refreshed every year.
Which one your customers really want
Look at evidence, not assumptions. Go through the last ten security questionnaires and lost deals. Note who asked for what, how firmly, and where they were based.
- If most revenue comes from US mid-market and enterprise SaaS buyers, SOC 2 Type 2 is usually the faster unlock.
- If you sell to Australian, UK or European enterprises, government or regulated industries, ISO 27001 is usually expected.
- If buyers say "or equivalent", either may work, and a strong security pack can carry you while you prepare.
- If you need both, design one control set and map it to both frameworks so evidence is collected once.
What drives effort and cost
- Scope: number of products, environments, locations and people.
- Maturity: whether you already have documented processes and records.
- Tooling: how easily you can produce evidence from your cloud, identity and ticketing systems.
- Observation period: SOC 2 Type 2 cannot finish until the period ends.
- Auditor choice: rates and approaches vary widely, so get several quotes.
A sensible first step either way
- Write down your target customers and what assurance they ask for.
- Assess current controls against the chosen framework.
- Fix high-impact gaps first: MFA, access reviews, logging, backups, vendor list.
- Start collecting evidence continuously, not at audit time.
- Prepare a security overview document for sales while assurance is in progress.
Be transparent while you get there
Do not claim a certification or report you don't have. Buyers respond well to an honest roadmap: the framework you are pursuing, your target dates, and evidence of the controls already in place. That honesty is itself a signal of a mature security culture.
About the author
Mason Trevaskis is the founder of StrikeWard, a practitioner-led security guidance company based in Australia. This article is general guidance, not legal advice, and does not guarantee any security outcome.
Not sure which assurance path fits your buyers? Let's work it out.
Plan your assurance roadmap